> In ACK generated by client transaction for non-200 responses 
> the bis clearly states that the topmost Via should be used 
> when constructing the ACK request.  What about the ACK 
> generated for 200 OK? I guess that this kind of ACK should 
> have a unique Via branch ( not matching the ACKed INVITE's 
> branch) but I couldn't clearly derive it from bis. Could 
> someone please clarify what is the correct behaviour ?

After sending a 200 response, the UAS/proxy 
cannot rely upon the branch being the 
same because the prior proxy might not 
have added itself to the record-route.
Thus it ultimately should not make a 
difference either way.

Attachment: winmail.dat
Description: application/ms-tnef

Reply via email to