Hi, 

A question about the Timestamp header BNF in bis-09:

 Timestamp  =  "Timestamp" HCOLON 1*(DIGIT)
                      [ "." *(DIGIT) ] [ delay ]
 delay      =  *(DIGIT) [ "." *(DIGIT) ]

Following this, "Timestamp: 10.32.1" is a valid timestamp header, since there 
is no kind of separator betweem the stamp and the delay. Probably there 
should be an LWS there. Is this correct ?

Nils Henrik


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to