ok Ranjit ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:15 PM Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Forking question.
> No, the call-id is exactly the same in this scenario. > > What Aliza is asking for is what we call Merged requests (Section > 8.2.2.2 in bis-09). That section refers you to 17.2.3 which tells you to > compare the branch-id of the top via headers of both requests. > > /Hisham > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ext Ranjit Avasarala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:37 AM > > To: Aliza Nagauker; Sip-implementors (E-mail) > > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Forking question. > > > > > > one way to distinguish is by call-id > > Ranjit > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Aliza Nagauker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Sip-implementors (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:47 PM > > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Forking question. > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > When a UAC recives several INVITE request: > > > > > > How can it identify them as INVITEs of forking and not > > INVITE according to > > > retransmission? > > > > > > Is it only according to the comperation of the via filed > > withe the via > > field > > > in the previous requests, or > > > maybe there is a quiker way? > > > > > > Thanks, Aliza > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
