"Vijay K. Gurbani" wrote:
>
> Inline.
>
> Attila Sipos wrote:
> >
> > I have a question regarding section "12.2.1.1 Generating the Request"
> > in RFC2543 bis-09.
> >
> >
> >> If the route set is not empty, and its first URI does not contain
> the
> >> lr parameter, the UAC MUST place the first URI from the route set
> >> into the Request-URI, stripping any parameters that are not allowed
> >> in a Request-URI. The UAC MUST add a Route header field containing
> >> the remainder of the route set values in order, including all
> >> parameters. The UAC MUST then place the remote target URI into the
> >> Route header field as the last value.
> >>
> >> For example, if the remote target is sip:user@remoteua and the route
> >> set contains
> >>
> >> <sip:proxy1>,<sip:proxy2>,<sip:proxy3;lr>,<sip:proxy4>
> >>
> >>
> >> The request will be formed with the following Request-URI and Route
> >> header field:
> >>
> >> METHOD sip:proxy1
> >> Route: <sip:proxy2>,<sip:proxy3;lr>,<sip:proxy4>,<sip:user@remoteua>
> >>
> >
> > The last sentence in the first paragraph says:
> > "The UAC MUST then place the remote target URI into the
> > Route header field as the last value."
> >
> > My question:
> > Is the remote traget URI added to the "route set"?
>
> Yes; it is appended to the Route set.
No, that is not right. Please see Robert's response on this - Robert is
correct.
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Avenue
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PH: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
