Re: [Sip-implementors] Target set caluclation & Route header

[Sachin Shenoy]

Thanks for you reply.   I couldn't find mention of this explicitly anywhere in the RFC. Can you please give me any pointer to section within RFC which deals with this.   I expected section 16.5 Determining Request Targets, to explictly mention that if route is present then it would be placed as the only entry within the target set.   Thanks Sachin     comments inline -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sachin Shenoy Sent: Thursday, 29 August 2002 5:33 PM To: Sip-Implementors Subject: [Sip-implementors] Target set caluclation & Route header Hi,   According to the RFC, If the domain of the request-uri is of proxies domain then proxy is responsible for routing the request. What would happen if the domain of the request URI is proxies domain, but the request also contains route header?   What should proxy do? Forward the request to the location in the route header? Or do a locations search and forward to the locations returned from the search. [Raja] First preference always goes to the Route irrespective of whether the proxy is responsible for the domain or not    Thanks Sachin