<trimmed the cross post to the SIP
list>
Jonathan essentially answered this in the Max-Forward
checking thread:
Implementations aren't binary in terms of their support for 3261. Some support some of the features, others more, and others, all. Such mixed implementations are a reality, and that is why we choose to support backwards compatibility on a feature-by-feature basis rather than glomming it all into a new version of SIP.
-----Original Message-----In a message dated 9/4/02 3:16:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sip] RE: [Sip-implementors] sip version
Am I missing something here?
I thought the RFC3261 SHOULD have assigned a different SIP version number...
that's what a version number is meant for!
- Satya
I'm waiting with bated breadth for the answer to this one!
Mike Pierce
Artel
