rfc3261 quote:
This response( point to 200-for-CANCEL) is constructed following the procedures
described in Section 8.2.6
noting that the To tag of the response to the CANCEL and the To tag in the
response to the original request SHOULD be the same.
if the response to the original request have the to-tag, so the 200-for-CANCEL should
have the same to-tag.
>At 12:39 AM 10/19/2002, Dong, Hwan wrote:
>>toTag is used to identify a dialog, however. Shouldn't the toTag in one
>>dialog cycle be SAME? Otherwise, what is the purpose of toTag in 200-CAN?
>
>I'm not aware of a use of toTag in 200-CAN.
>
>-Jiri
>
wangwq
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
