[Sip-implementors] a doubt in SIP header (call-id)

[satya]

Hi,       SUB: a doubt in SIP header (call-id)   I had faced one problem when i'm testing my company's inhouse product, which is implementing SIP.   Here my role is :          To test the parser modules ---- which are written for headers in SIP like ----  call-id, to, from, via, contact,                 contact-length, cseq......         When i'm trying to test the call-id module... i gave a header like the following one               Call-ID: 87602@[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                  it is parsed with local-id as  87602  and                                         host      as  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                    but what is I expect was                                         local-id as  87602@141351  and                                         host      as  worcester.bell-telephone.com      since as per the rfc 2543....... I can give the 'reserved' letter '@'  in local-id.   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                 Call-ID = ( "Call-ID" | "i" ) ":" local-id "@" host local-id = 1*uric uric = reserved | unreserved | escaped reserved = ";" | "/" | "?" | ":" | "@" | "&" | "=" | "+" | "$" | "," unreserved = alphanum | mark mark = "-" | "_" | "." | "!" | "~" | "*" | "'" | "(" | ")" escaped = "%" hex hex alphanum = alpha | digit digit = "0" | "1" | "2" | "3" | "4" | "5" | "6" | "7" | "8" | "9" alpha = lowalpha | upalpha upalpha = "A" | "B" | "C" | "D" | "E" | "F" | "G" | "H" | "I" | "J" | "K" | "L" | "M" | "N" | "O" | "P" | "Q" | "R" | "S" | "T" | "U" | "V" | "W" | "X" | "Y" | "Z" lowalpha = "a" | "b" | "c" | "d" | "e" | "f" | "g" | "h" | "i" |"j" | "k" | "l" | "m" | "n" | "o" | "p" | "q" | "r" |"s" | "t" | "u" | "v" | "w" | "x" | "y" | "z" hex = "A" | "B" | "C" | "D" | "E" | "F"| "a" | "b" | "c" | "d" | "e" | "f" | digit -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   So my doubt was " whether the reserved letter @ can be used in the local-id  part of call-id header or not"   ......  could u please clarify.. this issue....   Please find some time to clear this....I'll be greatful to u...   Regards, Senapathy T. ( please reply to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )