Hi Peter,

The duration of the validity of the Contact URI can be indicated
through an Expires header field or an expires parameter in the
Contact header field.

So I think that the 200 response of REGISTER in the example should
be acceptable since it contains the Expires header,Even though RFC 3261
Sec. 10.3, bullet 8 states that "Each Contact value MUST feature an
"expires" parameter indicating its expiration interval chosen by the
registrar."

Maybe,the same rule stated in Sec. 10.2.1.1 (2nd Para) should be valid
for 200 response of REGISTER.

Regards
Monica Ingudam
Huawei Technologies, Bangalore



> [Sip-implementors] 2 nits
> Peter P?ppinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:peter.paeppinghaus%40siemens.com>
> Fri, 08 Nov 2002 15:50:41 +0100
> Hi,
>
> I believe to have stumbled on two bugs in examples.
>
> 1) Quotation from draft-ietf-sipping-reg-event-00.txt, p. 18:
>
>    "Later on, the user registers (5):
>
>     REGISTER sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIP/2.0
>     Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pc34.bar.com;branch=z9hG4bKnaaff
>     From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=99a8s
>     To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     CSeq: 9976 REGISTER
>     Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
>     The Request-URI in this example violates RFC 3261, sec. 10.2:
>     "The userinfo and "@" components of the SIP URI MUST NOT
> be present."
>
> 2) The 200 OK in the REGISTER example of RFC 3261, sec. 24.1 contains
>     an Expires header, but no expires parameter in the Contact header.
>
>     This violates RFC 3261, sec. 10.3, bullet 8:
>     "Each Contact value MUST feature an "expires" parameter
>      indicating its expiration interval chosen by the registrar."
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter Paeppinghaus
>
> --
> Dr. Peter P?ppinghaus
> Siemens AG            | Phone:    +49 89 - 722 40065
> ICM N PG U ID A1      | Fax:      +49 89 - 722 58726
> Hofmannstr. 51        | Visitors: Building 1713 / Room 714
> D - 81359 M��nchen     | Email:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to