|
What
we do is sending additional information that indicates both the private address
and the public address. This is done both in the SDP part *and* the contact, as there we have the same
problem. For
two-tier NAT, there would be three addresses. I
a INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIP/2.0 -- Dr.-Ing. sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Urspr�ngliche
Nachricht----- Hi, All, I had a question regarding extensions to SDP to make it NAT
friendly, some *drafts*
mention using "active"
to indicate UAs ( behind NAT ) which want to initiate a bi-directional RTP/TCP
connection and using "passive"
for UAs at the receiving end. Is there a procedure in the SIP-SDP *standards*
by which we can specify an active side of a TCP connection or an active side of
a bi-directional RTP connection? Best Regards' Rahul |
- [Sip-implementors] Active Passive SDP extensions! Rahul Gulati
- Re: [Sip-implementors] Active Passive SDP extensi... Christian Stredicke
- Re: [Sip-implementors] Active Passive SDP ext... Rahul Gulati
- AW: [Sip-implementors] Active Passive SDP... Christian Stredicke
