I did not get any replies from anyone - hopefully everyone was too busy off coding up the identity stuff and just did not have time to respond to me ;-)
I have some calls flows with MESSAGE messages with attached signature and a binary transfer encoding. Does anyone else want to try reading these? What transfer encoding should I be the preferred scheme in SIP? All the examples are base64 but this is less efficient that binary. Anyone care? Multipart MIME is really easy to implement in the global sense of things - can anyone send me some of their multipart messages I can try to parse? The whole SMIME space needs more implementations for us to understand if this part of 3261 is right. I'm going to try to get a working open source implementation available for people to play with and test. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Open source may not be part of your product plan but I think having a good understanding of how to implement SIP security in an interoperable way would be a big benefit to everyone on this list. Thanks, Cullen > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Robert Sparks > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 8:04 AM > To: Cullen Jennings; Cullen Jennings > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about SMIME implementations > > > The lack of list response here frightens me folks! > > I hope Cullen got a lot of private replies about the > multipart MIME support at least. > > I'd like it to be a community goal to at least have no > implementations that do bad things at SIPIT 12 because they > received a message with a multipart MIME body. > > And I really hope we have more than one implementation > of S/MIME to work with. > > RjS > > On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 23:36, Cullen Jennings wrote: > > > > Is there anyone to do some interop testing with? Has anyone posted > > some message traces? > > > > I have been doing a bit of work on an open source > implementation based > > on openssl and wanted to try it out. > > > > Which transfer encoding is preferred? This topic seem > somewhat avoid > > in the current drafts. > > > > How widely supported in multipart mime in UAs? > > > > Thanks, Cullen > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/> sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
