Yes, and the sad thing was this bug had already been reported against -06, but I didn't get the fix into -07.
I'm tracking it in the bugzilla database, it will be corrected during author's 48. RjS On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 02:47, Mohana Sundaram wrote: > Hi, > > According to : > > " Thus, for the second and subsequent REFER requests a UA receives in a > given dialog, it MUST include an id parameter[2] in the Event header > field of each NOTIFY containing the sequence number (the number from > the CSeq header field value) of the REFER this NOTIFY is associated > with. " > > But in Section 4.2, NOTIFY Message (F9), does not have id parameter > value in it. > I think this is incorrect. > > Thanks, > - Mohan. > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
