I know this answer is short but I hope it helps :-) Use an Anonymous from and add an id to the Privacy header. So you might end up with a message with the following headers:
From: "Anonymous" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=9802748 P-Asserted-Identity: "Cullen Jennings" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Privacy: id Cullen > -----Original Message----- > From: Li Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:22 PM > To: 'Cullen Jennings'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Sip] SIP Privacy draft > > > Using rfc 3325, if I want to do a feature of "Caller Id presentation > restriction", how should I do it, assuming caller, callee and > everything > in between is trusted? The caller should place a > P-Preferred-ID in the > INVITE message that has "anonymous" in the display field and > also use "anonymous" in the display field in the "from" header? > > Thanks, > > Li Li > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:23 AM > > To: 'Li Li'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Sip] SIP Privacy draft > > > > > > > > It became RFC 3325 > > > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3325.txt > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > > Behalf Of Li Li > > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 6:39 AM > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: [Sip] SIP Privacy draft > > > > > > > > > Can anybody help me to understand what happened to the > > > privay draft that had the remote-party-ID header? Is > > > it completely obsoleted? Or is it moved to some other > > > draft? RFC 3323 does not include such header operation > > > mechanism. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Li Li > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Burnside, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:49 AM > > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > Subject: [Sip] Inter-domain QoS with SIP > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > I am currently looking at options for providing QoS managed > > > > inter-domain connections using SIP. This will probably be in a > > > > DiffServ architecture, > > > > with aggregated flows between domains where possible. Has > > > > there been much > > > > work done in this area with SIP? > > > > > > > > I saw that Henry Sinnreich had an Internet Draft out on > this topic > > > > back in 2000, though I can't find any references to subsequent > > > > work. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Andrew Burnside _______________________________________________ > > > > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on > current sip Use > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the > > application of sip > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
