[...]
> hop-by-hop TLS indicated by SRV. We identified a concern with
> respect to record-routing when using TLS, similar to the old
> question about record-routing when using non-default transports.
> How can you be sure that the record-routing elements on either
> side of you will accept each other's credentials? This will
> require some list discussion. For now, the safe answer is to
> always record-route if you are using TLS.

I probably missed the conclusions about using non-default
transports. Was the conclusion to use record-routing when
a non-default transport is used, and advertise the transport
in record-route? What if only one side understands the
transport?

Thanks,

-Jiri
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to