I thought CANCEL in either case should be just fine. (Will we be violating the spec by sending CANCEL in the first case?) -satya
-----Original Message----- From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:54 AM To: Gupta Adetya-A19368 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] for noresponse to Invite, should it be bye or cancel Hi, In the first case you shouldn't send anything. In the second case you should send CANCEL. Regards, Christer Holmberg Ericsson Finland Gupta Adetya-A19368 wrote: > Hello All, > > In the following scenarios, > should we be sending BYE or CANCEL > > CASE 1 > A B > | | > | INVITE | > |-------------------------------->| > | INVITE | > |-------------------------------->| > | INVITE | > |-------------------------------->| > | INVITE | > |-------------------------------->| > no response Times out > | | > | BYE | > |-----------> | > | CANCEL | > |-----------> | > > out of BYE & CANCEL, which one should be sent. > > CASE 2 > A B > | | > | INVITE | > |-------------------------------->| > | 100 | > |<--------------------------------| > | no further response Times out > | | > | BYE | > |-----------> | > | CANCEL | > |-----------> | > > out of BYE & CANCEL, which one should be sent. > > regards > Adetya > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
