Good finding..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris McKinnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mailing List SIP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:48 AM
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Comments
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at the "Server" and "User-Agent" headers and I see a
> conflict with the "comment" fields (in the BNF). Say you had:
> "Server: Virtual Phone (Demo) v1.1". This should parse into 3
> "server-val" fields (product comment product) with a single space of
> "LWS" between each field. However, because "comment" allows "SWS"
> before and after the "(" and ")" the space after "(Demo)" will get
> included with the comment. The parser is trying to find "LWS
> SWS(...)SWS LWS" which causes issues. Should comments allow "SWS"
> before the first "(" and after the last ")"? Is this a know bug? Or
> should "LWS" in the header actually be "COMMA"?
> [ABN] I feeel its better to change the definitions of LPAREN and RPAREN to
LPAREN = "(" ; left parenthesis
RPAREN = ")" ; right parenthesis
Probably we can apply teh similar chenge to following definitions also...
STAR = SWS "*" SWS ; asterisk
SLASH = SWS "/" SWS ; slash
EQUAL = SWS "=" SWS ; equal
LPAREN = SWS "(" SWS ; left parenthesis
RPAREN = SWS ")" SWS ; right parenthesis
RAQUOT = ">" SWS ; right angle quote
LAQUOT = SWS "<"; left angle quote
COMMA = SWS "," SWS ; comma
SEMI = SWS ";" SWS ; semicolon
COLON = SWS ":" SWS ; colon
LDQUOT = SWS DQUOTE; open double quotation mark
RDQUOT = DQUOTE SWS ; close double quotation mark
Regards,
Nataraju A.B.
> Thanks,
>
> Chris McKinnon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
