Hi Sushil,

It is not a SIP method.
The draft  "http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
draft-burger-sipping-netann-07.txt"
defines 'Basic Network Media Services with SIP' which includes netannc
(network announcements).

Elias
Hughes Software Systems
http://www.hssworld.com



                                                                           
             "Sushil Kumar                                                 
             Verma"                                                        
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          To 
             l.com>                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
             Sent by:                                                   cc 
             sip-implementors-                                             
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                     Subject 
             ia.edu                    [Sip-implementors] SIP NETANNC      
                                       method                              
                                                                           
             01/22/04 11:43 AM                                             
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           



                                                                            
 Hi,                                                                        
  Is there any SIP method called NETANNC?                                   
  If yes kindly inform me where I can  get the info on that.                
  Thanks in advance.                                                        
 rgds,                                                                      
 Sushil                                                                     
                                                                            
 -------Original Message-------                                             
                                                                            
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                     
 Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:33:44 PM                              
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                       
 Subject: Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 10, Issue 15                         
                                                                            
 Send Sip-implementors mailing list submissions to                          
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          
                                                                            
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit                  
  http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors            
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to               
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                  
                                                                            
 You can reach the person managing the list at                              
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                    
                                                                            
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific        
 than "Re: Contents of Sip-implementors digest..."                          
                                                                            
                                                                            
 Today's Topics:                                                            
                                                                            
     1. Experience with Windows Messenger 5.x SIP support (Arlie Davis)     
     2. How many NAPTR records are allowed/required? (Franz Edler)          
     3. SIPIT 14 late registration (Robert Sparks)                          
                                                                            
                                                                            
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------     
                                                                            
 Message: 1                                                                 
 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:14:08 -0500                                      
 From: "Arlie Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                  
 Subject: [Sip-implementors] Experience with Windows Messenger 5.x SIP      
  support                                                                   
 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                     
 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                         
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"                               
                                                                            
 I'm trying to get Windows Messenger 5.x to work with several different     
 SIP proxies/registrars, including one I am developing. I've had some       
 success and some failure.                                                  
                                                                            
 Has anyone been able to get Messenger 5.x to work with any known SIP       
 proxy/registrar? (It's using the MS RTC SIP stack.) I'm able to get        
 Messenger to register, and even presence information works correctly.      
 However, if I try to use Messenger to send and receive instant messages,   
 it fails. The net capture looks like this:                                 
                                                                            
 A = Windows Messenger 5.x client                                           
 B = Windows Messenger 5.x client                                           
 R = SIP proxy / registrar                                                  
                                                                            
 A -> R: REGISTER                                                           
 R -> A: 200 OK                                                             
                                                                            
 B -> R: REGISTER                                                           
 R -> B: 200 OK                                                             
                                                                            
 [leaving out SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY]                                             
                                                                            
 On A, open IM window for user at B. Type something, hit enter.             
                                                                            
 A -> R: INVITE                                                             
 R -> B: INVITE                                                             
 B -> R: 100 Trying                                                         
 B -> R: 200 OK                                                             
 R -> A: 100 Trying                                                         
 R -> B: 200 OK                                                             
 B -> A: BYE                                                                
 A -> B: ACK [race condition]                                               
 B -> A: 481 No call leg/transaction                                        
                                                                            
 Looking at the network capture, and at the trace information emitted by    
 MS RTC stack, apparently B receives the INVITE, accepts it, then           
 immediately terminates the session. Any ideas why?                         
                                                                            
 Any help is appreciated.                                                   
                                                                            
 -- arlie                                                                   
                                                                            
                                                                            
 ------------------------------                                             
                                                                            
 Message: 2                                                                 
 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:28:25 +0100                                      
 From: "Franz Edler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                
 Subject: [Sip-implementors] How many NAPTR records are                     
  allowed/required?                                                         
 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                     
 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                            
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"                               
                                                                            
 I am a little bit confused about the following statement in RFC 3263       
 chapter                                                                    
 4.1:                                                                       
     If a SIP proxy, redirect server, or registrar is to be contacted       
     through the lookup of NAPTR records, there MUST be at least three      
     records - one with a "SIP+D2T" service field, one with a "SIP+D2U"     
     service field, and one with a "SIPS+D2T" service field.                
                                                                            
 Some paragraphs before I can read:                                         
     If the server supports multiple transport protocols, there will be     
     multiple NAPTR records, each with a different service value.           
                                                                            
 I understand, that three NAPTR records are the maximum for a given server, 
 if it supports all three transport services. But that does not fit to the  
 above mentioned clause stating "there MUST be at least three records...".  
                                                                            
 Can anyone help me to understand this?                                     
                                                                            
 FRanz                                                                      
                                                                            
                                                                            
 ------------------------------                                             
                                                                            
 Message: 3                                                                 
 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:52:28 -0600                                      
 From: Robert Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                              
 Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIPIT 14 late registration                     
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                       
 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                      
 Content-Type: text/plain                                                   
                                                                            
 As there have been several requests to register for SIPIT 14 after         
 last Friday's registration deadline, ETSI has graciously extended          
 registration to this Friday (23 Jan).                                      
                                                                            
 RjS                                                                        
                                                                            
                                                                            
 ------------------------------                                             
                                                                            
 _______________________________________________                            
 Sip-implementors mailing list                                              
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                           
 http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors             
                                                                            
                                                                            
 End of Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 10, Issue 15                           
 ************************************************                           
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            


 ____________________________________________________
   IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to