-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett
Tate
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] doubt in CANCEL/BYE operation

> But definitely A can't initiate BYE before
> a final response for INVITE been received.

Actually it can.  During simultaneous ringing
situations, the originator can send
a BYE to release individual early dialogs
while allowing the other early dialogs to
continue.
[ABN] Why do you really need to have deviation for this particular
scenario? You can use CANCEL instead of BYE to cancel the early dialog.

See 9.1 Client Behavior ( of 3261 ) for more details...

----------- for ref ----------
   If no provisional response has been received, the CANCEL request MUST
   NOT be sent; rather, the client MUST wait for the arrival of a
   provisional response before sending the request.  If the original
   request has generated a final response, the CANCEL SHOULD NOT be
   sent, as it is an effective no-op, since CANCEL has no effect on
   requests that have already generated a final response.  When the
   client decides to send the CANCEL, it creates a client transaction
   for the CANCEL and passes it the CANCEL request along with the
   destination address, port, and transport.  The destination address,
   port, and transport for the CANCEL MUST be identical to those used to
   send the original request.
----------- for ref ----------

Thanks & Regards,
Nataraju A.B.

Confidentiality Notice

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this 
message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged 
information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to