Hi Jiri Thanks for the advice - it works perfectly now. I must say that out of the many Uas I have played with - more of them screw the tags up than less.
Thanks again for the help. Cheers Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 April 2004 05:50 PM > To: Jason Penton > Subject: RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags > > At 09:22 AM 4/1/2004, Jason Penton wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: 01 April 2004 09:17 AM > >> To: Jason Penton > >> Subject: RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags > >> > >> At 09:10 AM 4/1/2004, Jason Penton wrote: > >> >Hi Jiri > >> > > >> >Yes - I have. BUT I was under the impression that the 180 RINGING > >> >response is not REQUIRED to have a to-tag i.e. to set up an > >> early dialog. > >> > > >> >Is this understanding correct? > >> > >> indeed, to-tags serve the purpose if establishing a dialog. > >> 180 does not establish any, only 183 does. > > > >So then to fix the problem I am having - I could > theoretically remove > >the to-tags from all incoming 180 RINGING responses before > forwarding > >them to the UAC and my problem should be solved. > > you could, but it sounds to me like a too terrible hack. > > >Now my second quesiton is where in > >the SER code can I do this (first assumption is in the tm module > >??????) > > now, message mangling is done in textops. You need to set up > stateful processing (t_on_reply), process replies, look at > which you wish to mangle and eventually mangle them. > > -jiri > > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
