1. is this "correct"?
2. If the To username is not changed (as is in the internet-draft), then it is "out of sync" with the Request-URI username. Isn't this strange? Does it violate any SIP spirit?
King
On Wed, 12 May 2004 15:20:11 +0530, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it permissible (sensible in terms of SIP) to change the *username*
part of the Request-URI in a proxy's call forward action?It is not permitted to change the user name part of the Request -URI.
Sreeram
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of King Chung Yu Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Sip-implementors] Proxy call forward to another username
1. Is it permissible (sensible in terms of SIP) to change the *username*
part of the Request-URI in a proxy's call forward action? In the internet-draft (draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-6.txt), the "Call Forward" example does not have the username changed.
2. If the answer to the above is yes, then comes another question: should the proxy change the To URI's username as well?
Regards, King
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
