Hi, Is it a MUST to have the Via header in the response be exactly the same as in response ? For example, take a look at the PRACK and 200 OK exchange (seen below). Is the 200 OK response acceptable ?
Thanks for your time, Kasam <==== INCOMING MSG (389 BYTES) ON UDP PORT 5060 FROM 10.77.28.68 21:21:49.93 PRACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.77.28.68:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1i5qd520ag5rq9gft1s0.1sr From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>;tag=SD28qa802-1_1146_f150_f136 To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>;tag=a4d18280921214932 Call-ID: SD28qa802-1f6c8351b311c990cf0181d53f039b57-v3000i1 CSeq: 2 PRACK RAck: 7654 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Max-Forwards: 69 =====> OUTGOING UDP MSG (300 BYTES) TO 10.77.28.68 : 5060 ON SIP_CALLP_SOCKET 226 21:21:49.93 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 10.77.28.68;branch=z9hG4bK1i5qd520ag5rq9gft1s0.1sr To:<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>;tag=a4d18280921214932 From:<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>;tag=SD28qa802-1_1146_f150_f13 6 Call-ID:SD28qa802-1f6c8351b311c990cf0181d53f039b57-v3000i1 CSeq:2 PRACK l:0 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.732 / Virus Database: 486 - Release Date: 7/29/2004 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
