On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 11:05, Agnieszka Szczurowska R (TX/EUS) wrote: > My question is about BNF for digest authentication. RFC 3261 closely follows RFC > 2617, however RFC 3261 still provides BNF for Authorization header. > > 1) For SIP Authorization header should we use RFC 3261's BNF for Authorization > header or the one included in RFC 2617? > > 2) Which parameters are mandatory in Authorization header for SIP authentication > using digest. > > Our understanding is: > - follow RFC 3261's BNF for Authorization header since it is redefined here. > - there are no specific mandatory parameters. The only rule is to specify at least > one parameter (this will, of course, cause 401 from the server - we only want to > know the correct syntax to be used).
If you have not yet received a challenge from the server, just don't include an Authorization header at all. When you're challenged, you'll know which syntax to use. -- Scott Lawrence Consulting Engineer Pingtel Corp. sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.781.938.5306 x162 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
