--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
> 
> Thankx for all you commets.
> I'm going to definitively use  jrtplib and changing
> the code to make it
> symmetric...
> And concerning the SIP stack, i'll see between
> Resiprocate and Osip.
> Because this statement got me thinking about Osip
> 
> "The problem is that if you design a UA application,
> you
> have to write your own eXosip like UA layer since
> eXosip is GPL licensed, oSIP itself is LGPL
> licensed.
> Otherwise, I recommend you to use resiprocate.
> resiprocate provides a DUM layer which is targeted
> to
> UA application, very easy to use."
> 
> What's the DUM layer.... is it going to take me
> longer to develop the
> UA pplication with Osip because of this??.


DUM stands for "Dialog Usage Management", a UA layer
library based on resiprocate. The reason resiprocate
cannot compile in VC6.0 is that VC 6. doesnot comply
the latest C++ standard.

> My ptoyect it's acctually simpler than it seems (a
> SIP phone only for a
> LAN, that's it!, I dont have to address the entire
> RFC, so im needing a
> STACK that makes it the faster and easier to
> develop... besides I will
> have a an option at the end of the call that shows
> he entire signaling
> that took place(it will be brief because the call
> was done on a LAN))
> 
> I appreciate your help!
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Marco Aguilar
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________
> Este mensaje ha sido revisado por un sistema
> antivirus, por lo que su contenido est?libre de
> virus.
> This e-mail has been scanned by an antivirus system,
> so its contents is free of viruses.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>  

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to