> Is it correct to call it "forking", when > a re-INVITE is sent to alternative > IP addresses resolved from the DNS?
Thanks. I agree that the situation does not exactly match RFC3261's "forking" definition. And I shall try to refrain from calling it "forking within a dialog". As long as RFC3261 and RFC3263 permit it, I don't care what it is called. :) _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
