Hi, I want to know what is the difference between answering the media stream as *inactive* and answering the same media stream with *port set to zero*?
Thanks, Somesh S. Shanbhag --- Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Somesh, > > UA2 need not answer with recvonly - it may answer > with 'inactive'. While > UA2 could respond with port=0 that suggests that it > doesn't want to use > the medium at all. After responding with inactive, > it could send another > offer with recvonly, or it could wait and see if UA1 > does that. > > There are quite a lot of options here, and no > obviously best one. > > Paul > > somesh s wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Take the scenario: > > > > UA1 --------------------> UA2 > > > > if UA1 sends some codec in recvonly mode then > > according > > to RFC 3264, UA2 has to reply with sendonly. > > > > But in case UA2, prior to offer, knows that it > cannot > > send the offered media stream (rather it also > wants > > "recvonly"), how it has to reply? > > sendonly with port as zero?... > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > Thanks, > > Somesh S. > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced > search. > > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > ===== ------------------------------- SIMPLICITY IS THE BEAUTY. BE NATURAL LIVE NATURAL. ------------------------------- Somesh S. Shanbhag Mascon Global Communication Technologies. #59/2, 100Ft Ring Road Banashankari II stage Bangalore-560070 Karnataka INDIA ------------------------------- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
