> From: Jeroen van Bemmel > > On one hand the RFC states that compliant clients MUST add a unique > branch-id to each request they send [...]. > > On the other hand, since ACK is not sent as a transaction > (there is no > response) the branch-id is not needed as index into some > state table - it > will never match. So it could be left out. > > My question is now: Would a UAC that sends an ACK to 200 OK > with no branch > parameter in the Via header be considered RFC3261 compliant?
If the RFC says that the UA must install a branch-id, then any request without one is not compliant. Just because you can't think of a reason that the receiver would need the branch-id does not make a request without one compliant. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
