> -----Message d'origine----- > De : Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : vendredi 9 septembre 2005 10:29 > À : Vincent Luba > Cc : [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [email protected] > Objet : Re: [Serusers] Scalability in presence notification
> simple server and high network traffic > vs > complicated server and low traffic and centralized features > (buddy list...) You're right in my case I'll have to use server based. I've performed some load tests with SER and noticed that PUBLISH & SUBSCRIBE requests uses lot of CPU power while NOTIFY request are not that cpu intensive. > > Additionally, you also have to consider SIP implementations. > There are not thousands of SIP clients which supports all > presence modes. Some clients supports end2end, some clients > support server based. The same with SIP proxies. > > Conlusion. Get some clients and implement both scenarios and > find the one which fits your needs. I'll be using a GnomeMeeting mod client and server based presence should be enabled. Thank you for you information, Vincent _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
