Inline...
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 08:37 +0200, Uzi Doron wrote: > > > Hi Frank > > > > Is the payload type of these CN packets 13 ? > The payload type is 19, which I believe was the old value for the same thing. My client accepts both payload types. > It is interesting to see the full SDP of this session. I would assume > that the two UAs have to negotiate the use of payload type 13 in the Actually no. Neither 13 or 19 appears and any of the SDP. The INVITE is initiated by my client to the Cisco box (as the trace shows) and then the Cisco box does a re-INVITE that changes the port number on the Cisco side. In the four messages in which SDP appears, no mention of 13 or 19 is there. > SDP. We've come across at least one UA that does not support this > payload type, and that if you do send it such a packet - it will > generate a terrible scratching noise. So how was it in your case – > have the two sides agreed on using payload type 13 ? > The behavior my client is displaying currently is a choppiness on the playback of the inbound stream, working on it... Thanks for the tips! FM _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
