I want to know is it the genral behaviour of all UAC?

because as per RFC, c=0 has not been recommended for RTCP purposes,
anyway in these cases, we might need RTCP reports also,

Why cant we have one more attribute "a=hold" which indicates its meant for 
hold and not for one-way media audio stream,

Thanks,
Udit





"Avasarala Ranjit-A20990" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/04/2005 02:23 AM

To
Udit Goyal/C/US/[EMAIL PROTECTED], "SIP Implementors" 
<[email protected]>
cc
SIP IETF <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: [Sip-implementors] Hold SDP






Udit

You can use c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 to indicate hold in addition to a-sendonly.



Regards
Ranjit




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 10:42 PM
To: SIP Implementors
Cc: SIP IETF
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Hold SDP

Hi,

As per RFC 3264, user agent indicate hold by sending "sendonly attribute
(assuming sendrecv mode stream).
So when UAS receives this SDP, it should respond with "recvonly"
attribute.

But same mechanism can be used by user agent if he wants to play
announcement or music to user, so it can send "sendonly" attribute for
media stream.
I mean if it simply wants one-way connection (this is not hold).

For 3PCC (as B2B), if it wants to provide MOH service, how can it
differentiate between two SDP because it will play MOH only in the first
scenario when user press hold.

Is there any other way where user agent can indicate that this is hold
scenario and not one-way audio.

Thanks,
Udit
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to