[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As per RFC 3264, mode "inactive" ca nbe used for codec negoitation,
Consider the scenario where there is a call established between A and B
using codec 1,
If A sends Re-invite with media line having direction as "inactive" and
codec as 0 and 2
What should be the behaviour of B?
If it sends answer with codec 0 and 2 and mode as "inactive" (assume it
supports codec 0 and 2),
will it indicate that it had only answer the negoitated codec
and A and B are still talking using codec 0?
This is clearly wrong. The offer/answer has succeeded, and the direction
is "inactive", so this has superceded the previous agreement.
OR
there is no media between A and B now, if A wants, it can make it active
by another offer with the answer codec and "sendrecv" direction?
This must be the interpretation.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
