Hi Martin, I think it's valid.
You can check section 17.2.1 of RFC 3261. Regds, Somesh S. Shanbhag --- Martin Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > is it legal per RFC3261 to send two separate "100 > trying" provisional > responses for a SIP Request? > > A B > INVITE ------> > <----- 100 trying > <----- 100 trying > <----- (180 ringing) > <----- 200 ok > etc. > > A B > REGISTER ------> > <------ 100 trying > <------ 100 trying > <------ 200 ok > etc. > > With best regards, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > ------------------------------- SIMPLICITY IS THE BEAUTY. BE NATURAL LIVE NATURAL. ------------------------------- Somesh S. Shanbhag Mascon Global Communication Technologies Enterprise of Mascon Global Limited #59/2, 100Ft Ring Road Banashankari II stage Bangalore-560070 Karnataka INDIA Website: http://www.masconit.com ------------------------------- __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/ _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
