Hello,

I have noticed that some SIP User Agents are sending UDP keep-alive
packets in order to keep the pinhole on the NAT from closing.

But because of the fact that most of these NATs are either port
restricted cone or, in the worst case, symmetric, it means you need to
send the packets to their intended destination (including the port
number).

So, I worry about these packets because I think that maybe the
implementation of the receiving side might not account for packets which
are essentially "garbage" (for instance, a phone might interpret this as
a lost packet and do silence suppression, or a video codec may try to
conceal packet loss etc)..

Therefore I am wondering if any standards (or even best practices) exist
for the sending of such packets.


Dave
-- 
David Stuart, SIPquest
Email: dave (at) sipquest (dot) com
Phone: 254-8886 x234  Web: http://www.sipquest.com/
Address: 300 - 350 Terry Fox Drive, Kanata Ontario, K2K 2P5


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to