Hi,

 

I have 2 IP phones (1 Cisco 7960 & another IP phone, say IP phone A)
registered with fwd.pulver.com. When calling Cisco from IP phone A, I
noticed that the INVITE which Cisco received that 2 equal Record-Route
values. It probably is 'cause of the fact that the INVITE contained 2
VIA field values with same IP address but different branch parameters
(see bolded text in 2nd INVITE below).

 

I can't understand why the proxy (fwd.pulver.com) inserted 2 VIA header
fields. Also, would there be any impact on routing if Record-Route has 2
identical field values? Any explanation for this behavior?

 

Thanks in advance,

Anshuman

 

PS: 

1. First INVITE message below is from IP phone A to proxy
(fwd.pulver.com). Second INVITE is from proxy to Cisco.

2. When calling from Cisco to IP phone A, the proxy inserts only one VIA
header, as I was expecting (INVITE message not pasted here).

 

 

INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0

To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

From: Staka <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=200340ghj

Call-ID: 210950h9!

CSeq: 3 INVITE

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.25.21.217:5060;branch=z9hG4bK283970mxu;rport

Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,INFO,NOTIFY,OPTIONS,PRACK,REFER,UPDATE

Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Supported: 100rel,replaces,precondition

Accept: application/sdp,application/cpim-pidf+xml

Expires: 3600

User-Agent: Conexant-User-Agent

Route: <sip:fwd.pulver.com:5060;lr>

Accept-Language: en

Content-Type: application/sdp

Content-Length: 196

Content-Language: en

Content-Disposition: session

Max-Forwards: 70

 

v=0

o=731346 550 550 IN IP4 172.25.21.217

s=SIP Phone

c=IN IP4 172.25.21.217

t=0 0

m=audio 5000 RTP/AVP 0 8 18

a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000

a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000

a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000

a=sendrecv

 

 

 

INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0

Record-Route: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];ftag=200340ghj;lr=on>

Record-Route: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];ftag=200340ghj;lr=on>

To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

From: Staka <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=200340ghj

Call-ID: 210950h9!

CSeq: 3 INVITE

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.90.155.70;branch=z9hG4bK0ceb.85584e86.0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.90.155.70;branch=z9hG4bK0ceb.75584e86.0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.25.21.217:5060;branch=z9hG4bK283970mxu;rport=30719

Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,INFO,NOTIFY,OPTIONS,PRACK,REFER,UPDATE

Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060

Supported: 100rel,replaces,precondition

Accept: application/sdp,application/cpim-pidf+xml

Expires: 3600

User-Agent: Conexant-User-Agent

Accept-Language: en

Content-Type: application/sdp

Content-Length: 196

Content-Language: en

Content-Disposition: session

Max-Forwards: 68

 

v=0

o=731346 550 550 IN IP4 172.25.21.217

s=SIP Phone

c=IN IP4 172.25.21.217

t=0 0

m=audio 5000 RTP/AVP 0 8 18

a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000

a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000

a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000

a=sendrecv

 

 

Regards,

Anshuman S. Rawat

 





********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use 
of the intended recipient.  Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by 
others is strictly prohibited.  If you have received the message in error, 
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to