hema,
The original dialog identifier is IMS specific, and is intentionally
vague. It is left up to the implementation to decide how to represent
it. It is something inserted into the URL in the Route header - perhaps
in the user part or as a URL parameter.
This is really not a question for ietf. It is very specific to the way
that IMS uses SIP.
Paul
hema ramesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TS 24.229 gives details on General treatment for all dialogs terminated
> by S-CSCF. It talks widely about the presence of original dialog
> identifier in Route header.
>
> When referring to the drafts on original dialog identifier, I feel they
> are not converted to RFCs yet and no example of using them in Route
> header is being explained.
>
> Can anyone tell me the usage and how this identifier would exactly look?
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
