Dale, Thanks for your response
Wouldn't a 6xx class response be better? Since the UAS can determine that it will fail globally, perhaps a 606 (Not Acceptable, global equivalent of a 488) would be better? Regards, Jeroen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale R. Worley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sip-Implementors" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 4:02 AM Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] best response code for bad request body > On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 23:26 +0200, Jeroen van Bemmel wrote: >> Short question - What's the best response code for a request invalid >> body? (e.g. PIDF that isn;t properly formatted) >> It's not so obvious which error code from RFC3261 is most applicable > > 488 Not Acceptable Here seems to be the closest. It does allow a > Warning header in which you can describe the problem. > > Dale > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
