On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 21:42 +0800, Joegen E. Baclor wrote: > Mere semantics, I guess. There is no reason why you should reject or > ignore a request with CSeq incremented by two either. I think the MUST > in the RFC is there for a practical reason. Why increment by two if you > can increment by one with exactly the same effect. Unless of course > there's a more logical reason why two is more appropriate than one.
More subtly, the UAS must not reject a request with a CSeq that is higher than expected, as the UAC may have sent requests with the intermediate CSeq's that did not arrive. Dale --- interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability test server _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
