Trying to properly manage interworking with PSTN with early media, and
pre-connect free call announcements, I would ask if someone can clarify my
doubts.

 

According to RFC3261:

o If the initial offer is in an INVITE, the answer MUST be in a

reliable non-failure message from UAS back to UAC which is

correlated to that INVITE. For this specification, that is

only the final 2xx response to that INVITE. That same exact

answer MAY also be placed in any provisional responses sent

prior to the answer. The UAC MUST treat the first session

description it receives as the answer, and MUST ignore any

session descriptions in subsequent responses to the initial

INVITE.

 

Considering this RFC only, and assuming the SDP offer is within the INVITE
request, it is not clear if the SDP answer MUST be present in the 2xx
response also in the case the SDP answer has already been provided to the
UAC in a provisional response (such as a 183 Session Progress). In case it
is mandatory, it appears the UAC must ignore the "duplicated" answers,
behaving as they are missing.

 

When using PRACK, it is not clear if provisional responses may be considered
as a "reliable non-failure message" in the sense reported above. If so, it
appears the UAS would no longer be needed to put the "duplicated" answer in
the 2xx response. Is my assumption correct?

 

Finally, things get more complex when media changes before 200 OK by using
the UPDATE method. Consider the following sequence:

 

INVITE (SDP Offer A)     ->

<- 183 Session progress (SDP Answer A)

PRACK ->

<- 200 PRACK

<- UPDATE (SDP Offer B)

200 UPDATE (SDP Answer B) ->

<- 200 INVITE (SDP ???)

-> ACK (SDP ???)

 

This is a quite common scenario to manage free call announcements before
3PCC-based redirection to the final destination. In this case, I'd like to
understand if the SDP in the 200 response to the INVITE is mandatory or not,
and if it is, how the SDP has to be filled and how the UAC has to consider
this new SDP (a new offer, or ignore it as RFC3261 says for the basic
scenario?

 

Regards

 

Andrea

 

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to