I believe in such a case it might be a re-transmission of an earlier
request. If it matches an existing transaction, it should re-transmit
the response.

If it doesn't, it could be a delayed re-transmitted request or a new one
(assuming that UAC generating the new request erroneously doesn't
increment the CSeq number). Either ways, I think it should be responded
with a 500 response. But I am not sure about that.

Anshuman

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Handling out of sequence requests

Hi,
According to section 12.2.2 of RFC 3261,
"If the remote sequence number was not empty, but the sequence number of
the request is lower than the remote sequence number, the request is out

of order and MUST be rejected with
a 500 (Server Internal Error) response. If the remote sequence number
was 
not empty, and the sequence
number of the request is greater than the remote sequence number, the 
request is in order."

The RFC however does not specify the UAS behaviour in case a request is 
recieved which has a CSeq number
that is EQUAL to the remote CSeq number (which could be possible due to 
network delays).

What should be the ideal behaviour of the UAS in this case? Which
failure 
response should be sent?

Thanks & rgds,
Shweta.
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors




********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use 
of the intended recipient.  Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by 
others is strictly prohibited.  If you have received the message in error, 
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to