Hi,
In this case, response MUST be given by TU, its responsibility
of TU to send response. A timer may be started against TU in non-IST to
protect the transaction; however, this is very much implementation
specific and nowhere mentioned in RFC.
Rgds,
Manju
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Regarding non-INVITE server transaction
Hi,
If the non-IST doesn't receive any RESPONSE message then what
will
happen?
RFC 3261 (in Figure 8: non-INVITE server transaction ) doesn't mention
properly
what will happen if the non-IST doesn't receive any provisional
response/final response.
Regards,
S.Kingston Smiler.
*********************** FSS-Unclassified ***********************
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
