I noticed the same mistake on IANA website a few days back. RFC 4412 correctly mentions the registration with IANA as:
"The following is the registration for the 'Accept-Resource-Priority' header field: RFC number: 4412 Header name: Accept-Resource-Priority Compact form: none" I remember a similar issue being resolved by IANA by contacting them on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Gaurav -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rhys D Ulerich Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:23 PM To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Error in IANA assignments re:Accept-Resource-Priority [RFC4412] Hi all, http://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters has a mistake in the Header Fields registry. It shows Header Name compact Reference ----------------- ------- --------- ... Accept-Resource Priority [RFC4412] ... but according to a quick peek at RFC 4412, it should show Header Name compact Reference ----------------- ------- --------- ... Accept-Resource-Priority [RFC4412] ... Anyone know who to contact to get this fixed? - Rhys _______________________________________ Rhys Ulerich WebSphere IMS/SIP SOA Enablement Developer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 512-838-1428 IBM Software Group - Austin, TX _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
