Hi,
according to RFC 3264 a stream is put on hold by marking it sendonly:
If the stream to be placed on hold was previously a sendrecv media
stream, it is placed on hold by marking it as sendonly. If the
stream to be placed on hold was previously a recvonly media stream,
it is placed on hold by marking it inactive.
Is it wrong to put a sendrecv media stream on hold by marking it
inactive? If so, why?
kind regards,
Sigrid Thijs
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
