second sdp in 2xx final response will be ignored by UAC. UAC will use sdp in
18x provisioning response
and call is set up successfully.




On 2/14/07, Nebojsa Miljanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trying to get a feel on how various developers interpret RFCs 3261, 3262
> and 3264.
>
> If you are acting as an UAC and you have received SDP in reliable 18x
> response
> (i.e. PRACK was used), and then again that same SDP comes in 2xx, what
> will you do?
>
> 1. Verify that 18x and 2xx SDPs are the same and accept it.
>
> 2. Tear down the call since you consider SDP in 2xx as an invalid Offer.
>
>
> Also, do you know of any UAs that require 2xx to contain SDP even after
> Offer/Answer was done with 183/PRACK.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>



-- 
Erol TuraƧ
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to