hi, Is encapsulation of INAP message's in SIP messages possible.
If yes, then please give some documents. regards, Amit --- Lee Dryburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't regard myself as a "sip person" so I can not > vouch for what > exists. But the question appears odd. INAP is > obviously IN whereas > base SIP is for session control, so the notion of > mapping does not > make sense unless someone wanted to write extension > messages to > achieve this. But even that does not sound a great > idea. Encapsulation > of INAP in a SIP message would make more sense. I'm > not sure if > someone has done that. Normally if you want to > transport INAP over IP, > you would use M3UA or SUA from the SigTran suite. > > Rergards > > Lee > > On 06/03/07, amit rehalia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Are there any efforts or documents describing > mapping > > between: > > > > 1) "INAP operations to SIP messages and > vice-versa" > > 2) "INAP operation's parameters to SIP message's > > fields > > and vice-versa" > > > > I couldn't find any draft or rfc for the above. > > > > regards, > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > > Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn > something new > > http://in.answers.yahoo.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sipping mailing list > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping > > This list is for NEW development of the > application of SIP > > Use [email protected] for questions > on current sip > > Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP > > > __________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
