From: "Barman, Sibon B \(Sibon\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> One thing I am still not clear if 3261 specifies clearly that the contact address in the response has to be the same (in literal sense) as the contact address in the registration request. Is the public address corresponding to a private address (in NAT environment) considered equivalent?
I see no reason to think so. I would not expect UAs to behave correctly if the REGISTER request contained the private address (which the UA knows) and the response contained the public address (which the UA does not know). Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
