Thanks for the responses.Sorry, I failed to mention this is *unreliable*. Why
send a 183 (no SDP) when you can just send the 180? Is there a difference?I was
thinking the 183 maps to an ACM or similar, in which case there is only
1.-will> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:41:58 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [email protected]> Subject: Re:
[Sip-implementors] 183 without SDP> > > > Will Quan wrote:> > Is it acceptable
for a gateway to send a 183 without SDP and then one second later send another
with SDP?--will> > If the first 183 is *unreliable*, then yes.> > If the first
183 is *reliable*, and the SDP in the 2nd 183 is an > *answer* then also yes.>
> If the UAS is the one sending an offer (because the UAC didn't), and > the
first 183 is *reliable*, then it must contain an offer.> > Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
