My understanding is that, if the UA doesn't want to handle all possible 3XX, it may process as 300. So a minimal requirement may be to support just 300.
Also 3XX responses are method specific. 8.1.3.2 Unrecognized Responses A UAC MUST treat any final response it does not recognize as being equivalent to the x00 response code of that class, and MUST be able to process the x00 response code for all classes. The 302 is a special case and has a limited expiry. The 300 response may not come with Expires. Thanks, Neel > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sip-implementors- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baniel Uri-CUB001 > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 1:30 PM > To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] prevalence and semantic of 300 > > What is the prevalence of 300 compare to 302? If I build a UAC, do I > need to worry much about handling 300 (or knowing how to deal with 302 > should be good enough?)? > > >From a practical stand - shall 300 and 302 be treated the same? > > > ================================================ > > Uri Baniel - System Engineering; Tel: +1 (847) 651 0925; > > Learning that does not daily increase will daily decrease" - EWC > > ================================================ > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
