This comparison matrix is old. I tried playing around with Sofia-sip a year back and it seemed like a good reference. But most of it was in C and was a little convulated.
If there is a more recent, more comprehensive performance metrics under it would be helpful. You could check out http://www.sipstone.org/ http://sipp.sourceforge.net/ http://www.spec.org/specsip/ http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-malas-performance-metrics-06.txt -Anurag > For a comparison of performance metrics/ compliance of open source SIP > stacks available (reciprocate, oSIP, SIPX et al), refer to: > > http://www.enseirb.fr/~kadionik/sip/stacks.pdf > > My 2 cents, > Gaurav > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sip-implementors- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ira Kadin >> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 12:17 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Stack performance >> >> Dear All, >> >> >> >> Could you provide me with some number of different SIP stacks >> performance (reciprocate, Rad Vision, ...) >> >> >> >> Could you suggest the characteristics we can use to measure the SIP >> stack performance (for example - number of simultaneous calls, call >> setup time, etc...). >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> >> >> Irena >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip-implementors mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
