Brian West wrote: > What is the valid way to express both IP4 and IP6 in the SDP letting > the remote side pick the one its capable of?
See S13 of mmusic-ice-15 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-15#section-13) for using multiple candidate attributes (c.f. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-15#section-15.1). For good measure, you may also want to scan SIP/IPv6 transition draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-04), although we will be updating it shortly to reflect the dicsussions on ICE vs. ANAT at the Prague IETF. - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org} WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
