This is addressed in RFC 4320, which also suggests normative updates to RFC 
3261. 
I did not understand the question about Cancel for non-Invite transaction, is 
that allowed or useful?

Sanjay 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
>Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:54 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
>Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests
>
>
>Hi Dale,
>
>I can't speak for others, but I have never heard about crashes 
>due receiving 100 Trying responses to non-INVITE requests.
>
>One question, however, is whether 100 Trying responses for 
>non-INVITE requests have any impact on the re-transmission.
>
>Another question is what happens if terminals, after receiving 
>100 Trying for non-INVITE requests, start to send CANCEL...
>
>Regards,
>
>Christer
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 4. kesäkuuta 2007 4:19
>> To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
>> Subject: [Sip-implementors] 100 response for non-INVITE requests
>> 
>> We're noticing that when the SIP network gets congested, phones will 
>> be fairly frantic about resending requests that they do not receive 
>> (provisional or final) responses for.
>> Unfortunately, this only increases the load on the proxy, which does 
>> not help the situation.
>> For INVITEs, the proxy sends 100 responses to stop the phone from 
>> resending (and to keep it from failing over to another proxy).  But 
>> for non-INVITE requests, 100 responses are SHOULD NOT.
>> 
>> However, we're considering adjusting the proxy so that if it 
>receives 
>> a resend of a non-INVITE request (on a non-reliable transport), it 
>> will send a 100 response to (hopefully) quench the resends.
>> 
>> 1) Will phones respond to 100 responses to non-INVITE requests to
>>    quench resends?
>> 
>> 2) Will SIP agents behave badly if they receive 100 responses to
>>    non-INVITE requests?
>> 
>> Dale
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sip-implementors mailing list
>Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to