This draft suggests using ICE or ANAT. Both of them are not widely implemented yet. I wish to know about existing (or planned) implementations with possibility to interop in the future.
Regards, Dmitry -----Original Message----- From: Gaurav Kheterpal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 08:59 To: Dmitry Goldberg; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] SDP Negotiation with dual IPv4/IPv6 connection draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05? Regards, Gaurav > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sip- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitry > Goldberg > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 7:15 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [Sip-implementors] SDP Negotiation with dual IPv4/IPv6 > connection > > Dear SIP implementors, > > We are going to implement an offer of two connections (one for IPv4 > and another one for IPv6) in the SDP. > > However there is still no standard method to do it. > > We are interested to get some input about existing implementations in > order to interwork properly. > > Have any company already implemented or is going to implement an offer > of two connections (one for IPv4 and another one for IPv6) in the SDP? > > What method do you implement with (ANAT, ICE or maybe any other method)? > > Thanks, > > Dmitry Goldberg > > Software Engineer > > SIP Team > > Tel. +972-3-9764135 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Web: http://www.audiocodes.com <http://www.audiocodes.com/> > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
